A big step from misunderstanding what you are examining to misrepresenting what you are examining.

While instructing me on how to live my life.

And picking my pocket.

ssat, you are very polite to use the word "misrepresenting", without "fraudulently" preceding it.

The problem for the Phil Clarkes of the world is that the genie is out of the bottle. And, unexpectedly, not a Clinton around to save their pant-suits.

Random search results.

http://www.naturalnews.com/2017-02-05-global-warming-world-map-fake-science-noaa-caught-in-blatant-temperature-data-fraud.html

https://science.house.gov/news/press-releases/former-noaa-scientist-confirms-colleagues-manipulated-climate-records

Natural News, Clipe? Really?

For the uninitiated, NN is a fake news site run by one Mike Adams aka 'The Health Ranger', who when he isnt copy-pasting absurd conspiracy lies, as here, promotes pseudo-scientific quackery up to and including a homeopathic cure for the Ebola virus.

Karl et al has been independently confirmed in the literature, the fake whistleblower was only tangentially connected with the underlying research, and his substantive claims are demonstrably false. All surface datasets indicate no significant pause.

The time taken for the journey from David Rose bombshell to pathetic sputtering damp squib grows ever shorter ;-)

Phil

"Karl et al has been independently confirmed in the literature" rather depends on your definition of independent. ;-)

Also depends on what you accept to be "literature".

Appeal to 'the literature'

Logical Phillacy.

For the uninitiated, ... is a fake news site run by one ... aka '...', who when he isnt copy-pasting absurd conspiracy lies, as here, promotes pseudo-scientific quackery up to and including a homeopathic agent of Armageddon.

Insert climate blog of choice.

The poor darling climate kooks. They have been brave blog warrioirs, full of the vitriol and arrogance of their ilk. Only the rug is pulled out from under them and it turns out all they have is used horse food.

http://www-users.york.ac.uk/~kdc3/papers/ihsst2016/background.html

PC,

The greenhouse effect is a miss-match between the planet temperature externally and the bottom of its atmosphere internally. The greenhouse effect is easily demonstrated to be a function of gravity and radiative gases.

The ocean surface is not part of the atmosphere just as the land surface is not. We don't measure the land surface, we measure the base of the atmosphere. Temperatures at the base of the atmosphere show a pause. The meaning of that is that energy in the atmosphere has remained constant.

If, if, the energy in the oceans has increased, that is not GE: It is a scientific curiosity.

http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2006/09/why-greenhouse-gases-heat-the-ocean/

http://variable-variability.blogspot.co.uk/2017/02/david-roses-alternative-reality-noaa-Karl.html

http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2006/09/why-greenhouse-gases-heat-the-ocean/

http://variable-variability.blogspot.co.uk/2017/02/david-roses-alternative-reality-noaa-Karl.html

Feb 6, 2017 at 11:34 AM | Phil Clarke

Neither of those sites has ever noticed anything wrong with Mann's Hockey Stick, or Gergis (twice) Are they reliable character witnesses for Karl? Who actually Peer Reviewed any of them?

Phil Clarke, all you are doing is reiterating how pointless Peer Review is in Climate Science.

Climate Science has proved itself incapable of finding it's own mistakes, let alone correcting them. It is not a science worthy of taxpayer funding.

http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2006/09/why-greenhouse-gases-heat-the-ocean/

Ha ha ha ha ha ha.

So what? A warmer ocean is not a warmer GE. The GE is a temperature at the bottom of the atmosphere, 33degC above the average radiating temperature to space which is ~ 5Km higher. P1V1T1 = P2V2T2 down the lapse rate. P2V2T3 is a Climate Science invention. If you have to add water temperature to atmospheric temperature to make your hypothesis work then don't pester me about it.

It's amusing watching them fake up science for a faked up climate conference, which accomplished nothing.

On time and under budget requires a little different ethic.
=============

Besides, arguing increasingly volubly about whether there was or whether there was not a 'pause', just brings it ever more concretely to those not involved in the debate that there is a debate. And it highlights, nay, underscores, nay, places in extreme relief, the fact that the scary warming scenarios are not happening.

The Phils, the Kens, the moshes, the Zeke's and a few more are spotlighted defending bad science. Their tarentella intensifies. The money, the power, the fame, that triple component toxin, still jangles their exhausted ganglia, but the herky-jerky show bores the onlookers more now than it terrifies them. The crowd is thinning, Phil, but dance on; you must.
==================

kim. Is the Rose revelation then a wolf spider's bite? The dance grows evermore disjointed till it resembles a dervish spin, going around in circles, going nowhere. Venom or religious fervour, take your pick.

Supertroll, it provides ammunition for all politicians currently in opposition, to raise concerns about politicians in Government, who may have signed up their countries to the Paris Climate fiasco.

Those politicians most enthusiastic about shouting "Denier" at their opponents, may find themselves in opposition, for denying freedom of speech.

Climate Scientists have circled their wagons defensively, but most of their rifles are pointing into the circle. Trump has not yet issued the order "All Climate Scientists. Fire Now!"

This is getting beyond a joke!

Cooling The Past, Warming the Present.

So, current zero trend less artificial trend = cooling.

Panic over.

Feb 13, 2017 at 10:36 PM | ssat

In Climate Science, you are guaranteed to get the best trend that money can buy, with historical records amended to prove it.

Big article on adjustments over at NTZ.

Big article on adjustments over at NTZ.

Feb 14, 2017 at 11:05 AM | Schrodinger's Cat

http://notrickszone.com/2017/02/13/more-data-manipulation-by-noaa-nasa-hadcrut-cooling-the-past-warming-the-present/#sthash.pmuMFzVn.dpbs