Comparison of the CMIP5 models and observations, now updated with 2017 obs.

http://www.realclimate.org/images//cmp_cmip5_sat_ann-1.png

Mar 20, 2018 at 12:34 PM | Phil Clarke

Real Climate is NOT a reliable source, except for those who believe in the resurrection of the Hockey Stick from the dead.

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/03/21/delingpole-noaa-2-5-degrees-f-data-tampering-science-doesnt-get-any-worse-than-this/

"The data tampering at National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) is even worse than we thought: over the last century it has exaggerated “global warming” in the U.S. by as much as 2.5 degrees F.

In other words, pretty much the entirety of the 20th century warming in the U.S. “measured” by the world’s primary temperature record gatekeeper may be fake."

Heller/Delingpole and now Breitbart have been pushing this myth for years, long after it was rated pants on fire.

http://www.politifact.com/punditfact/statements/2014/jun/25/steve-doocy/foxs-doocy-nasa-fudged-data-make-case-global-warmi/#atfhead

Phil Clarke, you need to quote reliable sources:

"In fact, researchers who have been skeptical of the government’s climate record have looked at the temperature data and found that it holds up (even if it contains errors). Zeke Hausfather, a data scientist, is a member of the group known as Berkeley Earth."

Berkeley Earth depends on unreliable sources for data.