Discussion > Criticisms and Defence of Australia's BoM
Re: the 'Skeptical Science' site, see Pielke Fils's article in Forbes.
Phil, truly, you should not rely upon that site. You only make yourself ridiculous. Really, 'tis so.
=================================
I saw the Pielke thing. He believes this
if you look at the statements we cataloged and debunked on her [Skeptical Science] page, it should make her unhirable in academia.
amounts to a career-damaging 'blacklisting', rather than oh, I dunno, just expressing an opinion.
Boo hoo.
Feb 9, 2020 at 11:13 PM Phil Clarke
It seems like an invitation to honest World Leaders to defund Climate Science because it is full of liars.
Political and religious fervent followers always ratchet up and can never step back from denigrating those with whom they disagree or see as enemies of their belief system. It is one of the primary fault lines in the whole climate scare thing - the serial resistance to admissions that they got something wrong and the abject refusal to look at evidence that cannot be used to exalt the congregation.
'twas ever thus.
Doesn't excuse SkS - but goes some way to explain their toxic antics. They seek to destroy those they cannot convert.
Snorf, snorf, Pages 2K, created alarmist propaganda.
And that is what they call research.
====================