OK it's just impossible to log everything
1. Presenter are just too badly briefed
2. There is an inherent culture that "the cause" is so important that extrapolating beyond the validated science is OK and indeed should be encouraged.
3. There is also inherent culture that clumate is the one issue where rhetoric should not be challenged, apparently believing grwen brainwashing that there is a vast (unevidenced) campaign by Big Oil to discredit green

- Of course almost every tweet of Eco-activis masquerading as reporters is contradicted by reality so there is no point in logging them here (Roger Harrabin, Matt McGrath)

Sunday 5th Jan BBC1 Andrew Marr show
"of course -35C in US shows climate change is increasing extreme weather events"

. Helena somebody uses the -35C temps in the US to say "deny as they will" this shows Climate Change leads to more extremes. At least Marr calls it Global Warming but agrees we won't see a gradual rise but more extremes. So, deliberate or not, the "extreme meme" is getting a good airing again. All unchallenged of course, can't be having any false balance can we.

Context :
1. This theory is not validated, and is generally considered unproven by acadaemics, with even the extreme IPCC, not upholding it.
2. Marr was negligent in not pointing this out, he should have been better briefed.
Remedy : next prog should read a complaint letter, and agree to better briefing to to stop it happening again.... but we know BBC policy is not to admit mistakes.

- BBC enviro output = "Green Madrassa" brainwashing kids ., says GrantB

- "Climate Change OPINION" is real,
.. it's happening
... and should NOT be suppressed
From Article in The Scotsman

More Events

Playing role of activist reporters on the Antarctic disaster cruise
- Inside Science .. see Bishop's blog
- 4 episodes of BBC World Service Discovery prog

Climate Change caused UK's storms
- Radio 4 : Today prog : Evan Davies patsies propaganda.. link Bishop's blog
Harrabin writes the headline .."Storms .. Climate Change no ruled out - say Met Office"
- Hyping of Cameron saying he believes

Daily Politics aired Green Party leader Natalie Bennett pushing fake 97% line ,.main BH blog
..was up against Matt Ridley .. but no time to debunk the 97% line

14th 28gate Mainstream media reports it, BBC doesn't ..link BH blog

I don't believe so much in conspiracy, but the BBC has a number of inbuilt biases which make the output similar to if there was a conspiracy
1. Bias towards the disaster and over optimism
hence will take disaster angle on Climate change and on Fracking
2. They go for false dichotomy world of diaster or amazing
- That's why they go for super optimism on Green energy, as quite simply the disaster angle is difficult to portray although that is the reality ..it's complex system to explain
3. Fakery is so ingrained in TV and media culture they forget what is reality and truth. They get accustomed to DECIDING what the truth SHOULD BE
...and then using fakery and spin to show that story rather than genuine reality.

Radio 4 iPM had a prog one week where a amateur weather expert debunked ice scares by pointing out Frost fairs used to be common for centuries in London but not every year, and a royal sleigh was used.
- The next week they balance this by having the same expert talk about extraordinary December 2013 rains as the worst in 150 years, but they made no attempt to push "the cause by climate change agaenda"

Expert "worst rain ever meassured in 150 years of measuring"
But P Homewood points to a196 year old story European 1717 great glood

A screenshot of Alex Culls Transcriptbox shows the recent BBC progs with climate ACTIVIST comments from both guests and the presenters :
Jan 10: BBC Radio 4: Brickbat-wielding climate sceptics have "a lot of very powerful voices in politics and elsewhere"
Jan 09: BBC Radio 4: Andrew Luck-Baker: climate sceptics guilty of "saloon-bar pseudoscience"
Jan 09: BBC Radio 4: Antarctic expedition used by "deniers" "as a brickbat to beat scientists and the science"
Jan 06: BBC World Service: The Return to Mawson's Antarctica - Part Four
Jan 05: BBC Radio 5: Sir David King's "simple notion" - severe weather "may now be happening more frequently"
Jan 04: BBC Radio 4: Beddington: weather today due to "greenhouse gases that were in the atmosphere in the 1990s"

note the same Andrew Luck-Baker segments from Mawson were used on the BBC WS : Science In Action prog
The SAME presenter Roland Pease took the same issues over to the business prog

Jan 14th BBC WS : Business Daily with Justin Rowlatt, (aka BBC's "Ethical Man"), full-on climate alarm mode, playing the Activist not a straight presenter
(Alex Cull transcribed)

Justin Rowlatt: So are democracies capable of getting to grips with such a massive, expensive and long-term challenge? I spoke to another oil man, John Hofmeister, who was Chairman of the Shell Oil Company until 2008. Does he think the world is ready to make the leap to a carbon-free economy?

John Hofmeister: I think we have to say, bluntly: the world is still committed to hydrocarbon energy. There is not the political will or the political courage to go in another direction, anywhere in the world today. Global leaders are not concentrating on this issue, and they won't until the people of their nations require them to, frankly. We're going to continue to use hydrocarbons for as far into the future as we can see.

Justin Rowlatt: Yeah, and if you look at the science, that means that we're going to suffer very serious climate effects that are going to make it harder for human beings to live on the planet. And by the time people realise that, and they demand change of their leaders, what the science says is it will be too late.

John Hofmeister: And I agree with you. On a list of 25 important priorities in the United States today, environment comes in about 22nd, among the population. That's a leadership failure.

Justin Rowlatt: So are you saying this is a failure of democracy?

John Hofmeister: I think it's not the form of government that matters, it's the performance of government that matters. And democracy's performance is terrible! And it's largely because money influences democratic outcomes.

Justin Rowlatt: Clearly there's some truth in that, but there is also a problem that, inherently, democratic politicians look to the next election - there's an in-built short-termism in democracy and it finds it hard to deal with long-term challenges, like climate change, particularly ones which ask for self-sacrifice.

John Hofmeister: Absolutely. And I use the expression "political time" - meaning the time between now and the next election - "trumps energy time or environmental time, all the time", absent a crisis that pushes the popular will to do something very differently.

Justin Rowlatt: Is this an argument that until the climate gets so bad that ordinary Americans recognise there's a serious problem that needs to be dealt with, democratic countries will not generate the leadership necessary to do something on this issue?

John Hofmeister: More than likely. I agree with you.

Justin Rowlatt: How disastrous is that, for the future of this planet? *

John Hofmeister: Well, most of us alive today will be dead. But our children will suffer for our lack of will, and we will have placed upon our children's and grandchildren's shoulders, a burden we did not care to bear.

(Temperature hasn't risen for 17 years .. so terms like diastrous are hyperbole)

link to Jonova UK poll: 62% don’t believe in man-made climate. Educated high income classes more skeptical than unskilled
-I don't like it cos it uses a warmist propaganda technique of adding the "non-believers" and the "don't knows" together to assert the negative, to say the majority don't believe, instead of the largest group believes.
.it's disigenuos cos if after they make up their minds not all the "don't knows" , become non-believers

It's impossible to keep up, as well as the systematic daily biases , there have been recent whole series used as vehicles for one sided climate alarmism as their presebters see their role as true eco warriors.
E.g Joel Werner, in Saving The Oceans on BBCWS & ABC
- Justin Rowlatt (Ethical Man) in Elements also on BBCWS
- most BBC science progs are happt to report every green science story from the extreme end without any balance or chalkenging to add perspective, not cqring that time inevitably proves them wrong.
eg. Wind Turbines stop hurricanes .,without mentioning tgat's from modelling parks of 100,000
Or Myles Allens theories on Extreme Weather
- BBC Feedback again being hijacked by orcestrated campaign by green activists against Lawson being allowed to cotradict a scientists wrong assertion that 'missing hea had been proved to be in the oceans

Richard Drake just posted against Stewart Lees BBC2 prog devoted to UKIP which he says was hatespeech as it used the denier word and suggested deniers should be killed

.. Of course that prog is balanced by all the other comedy progs devoted entirey to assassinating other political viewpoints, like the one about loony greens
#sarcasm

Link : DURATION: 30 MINUTES, previews on their website @BBCbang on twitter
- seems itbwill have stuff on Gas Turbines, but will probabky hype smartgrid theory as some kind of working magic.
"Presenters Jem Stansfield, Liz Bonnin and Maggie Philbin investigate how close Britain might get to running out of electricity.
We live in a world where the lights are always on, but will that be the case in 20 years time?
Maggie Philbin spends a day in one of Britain's most secret locations, the control room of the National Grid where she monitors our demand for electricity with supply. Here she learns almost half our generating capacity will disappear in our lifetimes.
Jem shows how and why most of our electricity now relies on gas and reveals a potential fuel of the future - liquid air.
Liz investigates renewable energy and tackles what could really offer viable solutions to our energy needs going"