Discussion > Random 403 errors
michael - many thanks for the kind comment.
I'll stick with what I decided, all the same. Tolerance of crap quality, plus workarounds and other kludges to enable co-existence with it, are what ensures its survival.
[essay on quality, BH, 403 Forbidden, Matt Ridley, Steve McIntyre, Lord Donoughue, Science of Doom, etc deleted]
windows 2000 (SP4++) Firefox 38.4.0
Mike Jackson /Martin A
I've not had a 403 since I stopped using Preview Post.
Now if someone could tell me a fix for the Windows 10 Critical Error on the Start Menu I'd be grateful.
Sandy there is a lot of talk about that on the net. Uninstalling Dropbox seems to work for some...
#1 (logged in)
#2
#3
#4
#5
#7
#8
#9
#10
#11
#12
#13
So:
13 postings (brief) (logged in) will provoke it.
~3 preview posts (not logged in) will provoke it.
[This is being posted using a different machine and a different IP address from my 10:42 test, the last before my being 403'd.]
"I have chased Squarespace and they have asked for more screenshots of the error messages - they think there may be a different one now. "
They are out of their depth. They are guessing. And fobbing users off with flannel to shut them up.
Or twelve postings will provoke it - dunno what happened to my #6.
Now if someone could tell me a fix for the Windows 10 Critical Error on the Start Menu I'd be grateful.
Nov 23, 2015 at 8:55 PM | Unregistered CommenterSandyS
Have you tried experimental registry hacks? (me? xp programs menu on win7)
https://www.google.ca/webhp?complete=0#complete=0&q=windows+10+start+menu+registry+hacks
@SandyS
Probably installed software problem such as anti-virus etc.
Clipe
I have tried several things, even got rid of it for a few days, seems to be something Microsoft don't understand, a bit like Squarespace, anyway thanks for the link. Only mentioned it in frustration at having to create another desktop link..
I can confirm Martin A's three strikes and you're out on Preview Post, Squarespace seem to be struggling, not sure they have even got a test blog so their developer, I assume there's only one, can test what they read here!
Martin A (23/11: 11.05)
I think you're right.
You posted: fKIDiJyL/6A8R2WFq @ Sun, 22 Nov 2015 08:46:20 GMT SEC-61.
The section in italics is the only thing apart from 'SEC-61' that could be an "error message" — and it is different with each event.
Or put another way, as I pointed out to them in my one attempt to get some sense, there is no error message per se. For them to think "there may be a different one now" simply demonstrates they don't have a clue.
test1
test2
I urge you to reconsider, Martin A.
Bishop Hill is better with your posts. Even if it was limited to ~three a day, with possible mistakes arising from lack of a preview function.