"Fact free smears and insinuations=par for the course.
May 23, 2020 at 3:42 PM Phil Clarke"

Why don't you quit your addiction to fact free smears and insinuations?

No facts to back up the smears, just more smears!

The other Phil Clarke chimes in

"Naomi Seibt

Thank you for being a patron!

Welcome to the Patreon community—we’re glad to have you."

When I chipped in some funds last night I was the 130th person so to do.

IIRC the monthly total contribution to Naomi was running at $1300 or it may have been in Euros.

I thank all my 129 fellow contributors and my new mate Phil Clarke 1 for encouragement Ian

Its up to 1400 Euros and it doesn't buy as much as it used to. Seven minutes of Naomi in her bathroom and Chris sitting in a park in a cap both reading lies into their phone cameras. Chris should discover where the camera is, learn about overexposure and ask whoever is frying bacon behind him to stop.

Embarassing. The older Naomi is going look back at this and cringe. If I had paid money for this limp bacon, I would be asking for a refund.

Can't wait for the next one, priceless, as I predicted. Lol.

May 24, 2020 at 11:08 PM Phil Clarke
Your sadistic and voyeuristic urges will probably win you a Climate Science Award.

Phil Clarke, for your continued pleasure

Naomi Seibt and Monckton now on WUWT. Note the video is only Part 1 of a series. It starts by debunking John Cooks 97% Consensus.

https://wattsupwiththat.com/2020/05/24/the-consenus-fraud-part-1-climate-of-freedom-series/

This is the first video for my new Climate of Freedom Series. Climate science explained in a concise and interesting manner!

TWITTER: @SeibtNaomi

INSTAGRAM: naomiseibt2000

TELEGRAM: https://t.me/naomiseibt

And in May 2020, every scientific association in the planet came to their senses, a hundred years of atmospheric science was overturned, the Paris Climate Accord was ripped up because ….

...A naive German teenager and a deluded classics scholar in an ill-advised baseball cap made a truly crap video on their phones.

:-)

THE CONSENUS FRAUD

Crept past the proof-readers there. Really, you'd be better off hoping this is quietly forgotten.

"THE CONSENUS FRAUD
Crept past the proof-readers there. Really, you'd be better off hoping this is quietly forgotten.
May 25, 2020 at 1:05 AM Phil Clarke"

Would you prefer CONSENSUS CON TRICK?

How does so much rubbish get past Climate Science proof readers?

There is no “state media authority” in NRW.

The State Media Authority of NRW is an institution under public law but not a state authority. She is a legal person and can only enforce her claims through the judicial process.

Ms. Seibt is not criticized by this institution for generally criticizing party politics on the subject of climate change.

The concrete reason for the criticism is that Ms. Seibt spreads her opinion on YouTube on topics such as party politics and climate change as a blogger, but at the same time has received money from the Heartland Institute for spreading this opinion. The dissemination of her opinion would still be legal, even the paid dissemination of opinion as long as it was clearly marked as such, but in this case Ms. Seibt has obviously kept secret that she gets money for it and that is exactly what is prohibited as product placement in NRW. This fact only came to light through research by journalists. Ms. Seibt had to admit it publicly and then stopped working for Heartland at short notice. Caught and walked stupid.

Comment via Google Translate here:

https://www.eike-klima-energie.eu/2020/05/24/deutsche-behoerden-drohen-naomi-seibt-mit-gefaengnisstrafe-wegen-verweigerung/

Phil Clarke

23 comments on MY Discussion thread is now my record. Well done you. As it happens I know where to send the badge.

StewGreen

can we re-consider the "no outing" policy just for Phil Clarke ?

Too late.

Phil Clarke 1 is REALLY called

........ drum rolll...

.....pause..

......

.....

......

Phil Clarke !

Sorry mate, but I'm not at my best at near 1am.

Naomi spoke very well on the video. I think is was the best debunking of the 97% I have seen.

Is the 97% a fra*d or a L1e or just a jolly conspiracy ?

Please spread the video far and wide.

THIS COULD BE A GAMEBREAKER IF IT GOES VIRAL.

Ian

ps, PC the back-lighting around Lord Monckton's head was an excellent,somewhat surreal visual effect and disguised his two small pointed horns effectively. (Sorry Christopher, no offence intended to you)

I think is was the best debunking of the 97% I have seen.

In which case, those on my side of the argument have little to worry about ;-)

May 27, 2020 at 8:57 AM Phil Clarke
You remain convinced by Cook's fabricated 97% Consensus as well as Mann's Hockey Stick and Gergis.

https://wattsupwiththat.com/2020/05/26/a-big-thank-you-from-the-front-line-in-the-war-for-free-speech/

By Christopher Monckton of Brenchley

"To all the kind and generous readers who have donated to the appeal for Naomi Seibt, I should like to say how very grateful she for your support. Thanks to your contributions to her Patreon account, she now has $1800 a month in income, and skeptics everywhere are spreading the word. Stefan Molyneux, who has interviewed Naomi in the past, has just retweeted it, and from there it has been retweeted almost 1000 times. *Latest news is that the State Media Authority in North-Rhine Westphalia has threatened Naomi with imprisonment.*"

Reuters have fact-checked claims by Monckton and others.

Verdict: False. Anyone surprised?

The Reuters article raises more concerns than it quels. I bet if the foreign influence was Greenpeace, they'd not have bothered her.

Reuters have fact-checked claims by Monckton and others.
Verdict: False. Anyone surprised?
May 27, 2020 at 3:24 PM Phil Clarke

Gergis was fact checked and failed
Mann's Hockey Stick was fact checked and failed
Cook's 97% Consensus was fact checked and failed

Climate Science remains in denial. No one is surprised.

The Reuters article raises more concerns than it quels.

Like why, in his pitch for cash, did Monckton state that Naomi had been fined, when she has not? That kinda thing?

You've convinced me Phil, I won't send any money.

May 28, 2020 at 9:25 PM Phil Clarke
Why should taxpayers have money stolen from them by Climate Scientists as that blade part of Mann's Hockey Stick hasn't happened?

Tiny:- No no no. Please send Naomi cash. We desperately need more iphone videos spreading zombie myths from a 68 year old baseball-cap wearing fake Member of the House of Lords and a naïve German teenager. Nothing remotely creepy about that.

Money well spent, no?

But you've convinced me Phil. Why would I send money now? In fact, your passion for warmism has me really rethinking my scepticism.

May 28, 2020 at 10:41 PM Phil Clarke
How many pointless awards has Mann won now, and from how many institutions that have discredited themselves?

https://wattsupwiththat.com/2020/05/28/giant-win-for-climate-skeptics-president-trump-just-removed-section-230-protection-from-abusive-social-media-giants/

"In a huge win for climate skeptics and Conservatives, President Trump just signed an Executive Order to curb the alleged abuses of social media giants and their allegedly biased “fact checkers”."