Republican Inquiry Finds No Evidence of Wrongdoing by Biden

GOP senators’ anti-Biden report repackages old claims

Ron Johnson's 'Report' Is Nothing But Innuendo and Weaselspeak

Sep 25, 2020 at 10:10 AM Phil Clarke

Democrats and Climate Scientists just keep making up evidence, force Taxpayers to pay the costs, and innocent people in to Court.

A perfect storm abrewing?
Trump threatening not to leave peacefully should he lose in November, a hyperconservative Supreme Court who may decide the election, and an armed electorate able and perhaps willing to contest the outcome whatever that is.

Trump puts himself forward as a Putin-lookalike strongman? States threaten to secede? Civil War II?

Refugees to Canada, Mexico and Europe?

A combination of some truth, some exaggeration. Overall rating : Somewhere between Yawn and WGAS?

A combination of some truth, some exaggeration. Overall rating : Somewhere between Yawn and WGAS?

Sep 25, 2020 at 2:21 PM Phil Clarke

ok, that's Climate Science, but what about lying Democrats?

The Trump-Russia investigation found concrete evidence of anti-Clinton Russian interference in the US Presidential election, uncovered links between Russian government officials and individuals associated with Donald Trump, found ten occasions where Trump may have obstructed justice (but did not prosecute because a sitting president is immune), generated 34 indictments, 8 convictions and/or guilty pleas including 5 Trump associates or campaign officials.

Debunk that.

Don’t freeze paintballs it makes them wildly inaccurate

As set forth in detail in this report, the Special Counsel's investigation established that Russia interfered in the 2016 presidential election principally through two operations. First, a Russian entity carried out a social media campaign that favored presidential candidate Donald J. Trump and disparaged presidential candidate Hillary Clinton. Second, a Russian intelligence service conducted computer-intrusion operations against entities, employees, and volunteers working on the Clinton Campaign and then released stolen documents.

The Internet Research Agency (IRA) carried out the earliest Russian interference operations identified by the investigation—a social media campaign designed to provoke and amplify political and social discord in the United States. … The IRA later used social media accounts and interest groups to sow discord in the U.S. political system through what it termed “information warfare.” The campaign evolved from a generalized program designed in 2014 and 2015 to undermine the U.S. electoral system, to a targeted operation that by early 2016 favored candidate Trump and disparaged candidate Clinton. The IRA’s operation also included the purchase of political advertisements on social media in the names of U.S. persons and entities, as well as the staging of political rallies inside the United States. To organize those rallies, IRA employees posed as U.S. grassroots entities and persons and made contact with Trump supporters and Trump Campaign officials in the United States.

… At the same time that the IRA operation began to focus on supporting candidate Trump in early 2016, the Russian government employed a second form of interference: cyber intrusions (hacking) and releases of hacked materials damaging to the Clinton Campaign. The Russian intelligence service known as the Main Intelligence Directorate of the General Staff of the Russian Army (GRU) carried out these operations. In March 2016, the GRU began hacking the email accounts of Clinton Campaign volunteers and employees, including campaign chairman John Podesta. In April 2016, the GRU hacked into the computer networks of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC) and the Democratic National Committee (DNC). The GRU stole hundreds of thousands of documents from the compromised email accounts and networks. Around the time that the DNC announced in mid-June 2016 the Russian government's role in hacking its network, the GRU began disseminating stolen materials through the fictitious online personas 'DCLeaks' and 'Guccifer 2.0'. The GRU later released additional materials through the organization WikiLeaks."

https://www.justice.gov/storage/report.pdf

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_incredulity

Elsewhere

President Vladimir Putin ordered an influence campaign in 2016 aimed at the U.S. presidential election. Russia's goals were to undermine public faith in the U.S. democratic process, denigrate Secretary Clinton, and harm her electability and potential presidency. We further assess Putin and the Russian Government developed a clear preference for President-elect Trump. We have high confidence in these judgments.

https://www.dni.gov/files/documents/ICA_2017_01.pdf

Debunk that.

Sep 25, 2020 at 3:32 PM Phil Clarke
Simple, 97% of your output is dishonest.

FBI v. Flynn/Trump:

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/09/breaking-newly-released-documents-reveal-fbi-agent-general-flynn-case-claims-run-top-no-crimes/

Zerohedge's take:

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/get-trump-fbi-agents-mueller-team-says-flynn-case-was-politically-motivated-dead-end

Who did Putin want to win in 2016, and who did John Brennan want?

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/secret-report-exposes-cias-brennan-overruled-dissenting-analysts-who-concluded-russia

Trump refused to commit to a peaceful transfer of power, his appointee killed the performance of the US Postal Service and had to be reined in by the judiciary even as Trump spread bullshit about virtually non-existent mail ballot fraud. He is ramming through a Supreme Court Justice appointment against the popular will. His campaign officials are apparently exploring ways to bypass an adverse democratic result:

According to sources in the Republican Party at the state and national levels, the Trump campaign is discussing contingency plans to bypass election results and appoint loyal electors in battleground states where Republicans hold the legislative majority. With a justification based on claims of rampant fraud, Trump would ask state legislators to set aside the popular vote and exercise their power to choose a slate of electors directly.

On all this, from Tomo, tumbleweed. No folks, it was Obama and Clinton who wrecked US Democracy.

Draw your own conclusions.

More on special agent Barnett:

https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2020/09/25/robert-mueller-investigative-agent-recently-testified-special-counsel-operation-was-intended-to-get-trump/

The comments are deplorable.

Free and fair elections in the US of A:

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/09/good-news-gop-challenge-pennsylvanias-mail-voting-rulings-supreme-court/

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/09/dirty-cop-chris-wray-says-seen-no-evidence-voter-fraud-fine-illegal-ballot-harvesting-democrats-steal-2020-election/

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/09/exclusive-california-man-finds-thousands-unopened-ballots-garbage-dumpster-workers-quickly-try-cover-photos/

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/09/election-fraud-democrat-officials-massachusetts-destroy-1-million-ballots-senate-primary/

Nothing to see here, folks. Move along.