When are you going to apologise for all your lies?

Immediately after you name one. But backing up your insults with examples, facts or evidence is not really your thing is it?

TTFN.

When are you going to apologise for all your lies?

Immediately after you name one. But backing up your insults with examples, facts or evidence is not really your thingis it?

TTFN.

Feb 16, 2018 at 9:04 PM | Phil Clarke

Actually, it is the Gergis Australia study, Joelle and her team have corrected the various issue and resubmitted the study and it has been reviewed and accepted, in the face of the usual denier unpleasantness.

Conclusion:"Overall, we are confident that observed temperatures in Australasia have been warmer in the past 30 years than every other 30-year period over the entire millennium (90% confidence based on 12,000 reconstructions, developed using four independent statistical methods and three different data subsets). Importantly, the climate modelling component of our study also shows that only human-caused greenhouse emissions can explain the recent warming recorded in our region."

Add it to the list.

Jul 11, 2016 at 10:46 PM | Phil Clarke

How many times do you want me to post this?

The fact that Climate Science has not seen fit to retract Gergis 2016, just confirms that Climate Science is not fit for purpose.

If Mann stopped evading the Legal Action that he instigated, he might seem more credible.

How many times has it been suggested that Climate Science should get honest about Mann's Hockey Stick?

Trying to accuse others, whilst avoiding admitting your own faults, failures and shortcomings, is Denial. Shouldn't you take your complaints to William M Connolley, the UK Green Party, the Green Blob and the original Hockey Teamsters?

Which bits of Climate Science are worth keeping? No one will believe you in particular, if you claim it should all be kept. That would involve keeping Gergis 2016, which you claim proves Mann's Hockey Stick. Either way, you need to acknowledge whether you lied about Mann of Gergis or both, which won't endear you to Climate Scientists.

Climate Science has depended on self appointed Peer Review. The EPA might as well discard those Climate Science papers that a self appointed panel reviews, and fails to approve.

February 16, 2018
Adam Schiff, meet Columbo!
By Patricia McCarthy

Mueller Is Losing Flynn, so He Indicts Russians

bakersdozengate

Is there any reason why the "Russians" shouldn't start accusing Mueller of something? It does not need to be true, or particularly serious, but if they do it enough times, they might strike lucky.

Feb 18, 2018 at 7:12 PM | tomo

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Moore

scroll down to Political Views.

What made him back Sanders?

Comes over these days as a gullible deluded twit who's made his mind up before he sees the evidence and definitely before he's thunk things thru. Could do with loosing a few pounds too.

Feb 18, 2018 at 10:50 PM | tomo

He could become a Climate Science expert, and gain millions more pounds of other people's money.

I can only guess why he campaigned for Sanders, and not St Hillary. He must have some behind the scenes footage or knowledge of Team Clinton's dirty tricks, but has put the documentary on hold. Did it involve Russians or Uranium or Whitewater or Lewinsky, or ... The possibilities are endless.

If his Left Wing Socialist Ideology is genuine, nothing wrong with that, then I hope he approves of Trump's efforts to halt and reverse Climate Science's destruction of US industry, manufacturing and jobs.

tomo,
Unless very greedy, he would not need to receive dodgy money, his films have been financially successful.

He may have lost some dosh on his latest project, (from Wikipedia):

"The pre-release subtitle of the film confirms the allusion: "The temperature at which freedom burns."[citation needed]As of August 2012, Fahrenheit 9/11 is the highest-grossing documentary of all time, taking in over US$200 million worldwide, including United States box office revenue of almost US$120 million.[2] In February 2011, Moore sued producers Bob and Harvey Weinstein for US$2.7 million in unpaid profits from the film, claiming they used "Hollywood accounting tricks" to avoid paying him the money.[34] In February 2012, Moore and the Weinsteins informed the court that they had settled their dispute."

"Fahrenheit 11/9
in May 2017, it was announced that Moore had reunited with Harvey Weinstein to direct his new film about Donald Trump, titled Fahrenheit 11/9[48], expected in "late spring" of 2018.[49] The title refers to the day when Donald Trump officially became President-elect of the United States."

Moore and Weinstein suing each other, and then teaming up against Trump? The Film could win an Oscar for Best Hypocrisy and Double Standards

Closer to home, what have the Czechs ever done for us?

https://order-order.com/2018/02/18/agent-cob-proper-internationalist/

Presumably we can sleep easy, because there wasn't a Red Russian spy under Corbyn's Bed. Abbott might have put the squeeze on him.

Feb 19, 2018 at 9:05 AM | tomo

As the US National Rifle Association keep telling everyone (whether they are bored with listening to them or not), it is enshrined in the US Constitution that every American has a right to be shot by a another American, with a legally owned firearm.

The FBI must have been too busy making stuff up, to deal with an obvious risk, that existing Legislation might have allowed them to deal with.

tomo, something needs to be done about US Gun Laws. If they cannot even enforce the inadequate ones they already have, there is little point.

I have no idea what percentage of these mass shootings have been carried out with Legally owned firearms. There are so many Legally owned Firearms already, and a vast number of unlicenced people owning firearms that would not be legal to own.

tomo, I knew it was a mess, but that Wikipedia entry is startling. Aphabetically, I only got as far as California before encountering this farce, with its own entry:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bullet_button